5/18/2023 0 Comments Praat scriptsFurthermore, we related the TRF components to our other neural "tracking" measures and found that M50TRF and M200TRF play a differential role in the shifting center frequency of the broadband coherence spectra. In the late responses M350TRF, the maximum response occurred for degraded speech that was still comprehensible then declined with reduced intelligibility. Reduction of intelligibility went along with large increases of early peak responses M50TRF, but strongly reduced responses in M200TRF. ![]() Our TRF analysis yielded marked temporally differential effects of vocoding: ∼50-110 ms (M50TRF), ∼175-230 ms (M200TRF), and ∼315-380 ms (M350TRF). In addition, we used inter-related facets of neural speech tracking (e.g., speech envelope reconstruction, speech-brain coherence, and components of broadband coherence spectra) to endorse our findings in TRFs. In the present MEG study, we exploited temporal response functions (TRFs), which has been used to describe the time course of speech tracking on a gradient from intelligible to unintelligible degraded speech. However, the temporal dynamics of neural speech tracking and their relation to speech intelligibility are not clear. Neural speech tracking of degraded speech has been used to advance the understanding of how brain processes and speech intelligibility are interrelated. Listening to speech with poor signal quality is challenging. These findings show the importance of including multiple linguistic levels in the analysis of learner discourse and have implications for a more holistic and functionally based approach to language instruction. Dimension 1, for example, identifies correlates of informationally driven discourse on all three linguistic levels under investigation. Results show significant differences between L1 and L2 groups on four of six dimensions and reveal novel patterns of co-occurrence. In this study, we investigate lexico-grammar, fluency, and prosody in LINDSEI (German, Czech, and Spanish) alongside British and American English comparable corpora, using multidimensional analysis, a statistical procedure that identifies co-occurring linguistic features and leads to functional interpretation of the discourse. ![]() Investigation of the characteristics of spoken learner language has increased in recent years but has been primarily limited to the investigation of one linguistic level (e.g., lexico-grammar), which gives a limited picture of learners’ overall linguistic competence (e.g., Skarnitzl & Rumlová, 2019 ). Using the results, we have proposed changes that can help refine the fluency rating descriptors and rater training materials in the TEEP. The results largely replicate previous research in this area suggesting that (a) speed measures distinguish between lower levels (5.0 and 5.5) and higher levels of proficiency (6.5 and 7.5), (b) breakdown measures of silent pauses distinguish between 5.0 and higher levels of 6.5 or 7.5, and (c) repair measures and filled pauses do not distinguish between any of the proficiency levels. A multivariate analysis of variance and a series of analyses of variance were used to examine the differences between fluency measures at these different levels of proficiency. Working with data from 56 test-takers performing a monologic task at a range of proficiency levels (equivalent to approximately levels 5.0, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 in the IELTS scoring system), we used PRAAT analysis to measure speed, breakdown, and repair fluency. The main aim of this study was to investigate how oral fluency is assessed across different levels of proficiency in the Test of English for Educational Purposes (TEEP).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |